Friday, September 27, 2013

A Brand New Perspective

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon is one part mystery, three parts perspective study.  Christopher John Francis Boone is a narrator unlike any other I have ever met (and when I say met, you know I mean lived life through his/her perspective in his/her book or story).  It's not every day that the protagonist is autistic.

Christopher is a mathematical genius, socially inept 15 year old boy who takes in everything he sees and hears and calls the rest of us lazy for not doing so.  One of my favorite descriptions of what it is like inside of his head was the piece beginning on page 141 in my copy about how regular people may see a countryside: some cows, flowers in the field, a few clouds in a sunny sky, a village in the distance, a fence at the edge... and they may not notice much else because they are thinking things like, "It's beautiful here," or "Did I leave the gas on?" (Which, of course, reminded me of this bit in one of my favorite comedian's stand up routines.  Excuse the language)

But Christopher sees much more.  He sees exactly what is there:  19 cows in the field: 15 black and white, 4 brown and white, mostly facing uphill.  The village in the distance has 31 visible houses and the church has a square tower.  There is a plastic shopping bag, a long piece of orange string, and a squashed Coca-Cola can with a snail on it.  Three different types of grass and two different types of flowers.  Etc., etc., etc.  It is overwhelming enough to imagine taking all of that in, but he also remembers everything he sees and hears.  At several points in this novel, he names a date and time and says exactly what his mother or his (teacher? counselor? therapist?) Siobhan were saying to him, wearing, doing.  It's amazing.  But for all of his remembering, he cannot process verbal cues, meanings behind facial expressions, body language, or slang.

In this way, I noticed that all, or almost all dialogue is in a she said/he manner.  If someone declares, whispers, utters, lisps, whines, exclaims, or scoffs, the emotion is lost on Christopher.  Reading expressions and feelings are out of his capacity of knowing.  This is why he likes everything to be very precise.  It bothers him, for instance, that his name means carrying Christ from St. Christopher and that his mother thought it was a nice name with a story behind it about being kind and helpful.  Christopher, however, just wants his name to mean him.  Now, I know that my name is not common, but I genuinely feel that it means me and I mean it.  What do you think about your name?  Do you feel like Christopher or like me on this issue? 

As an honest-to-a-fault person, I found Christopher's inability to tell lies quite compelling.  He sees lies as inventing something that happened that did not actually happen and the possibilities are endless.  If someone asked me what I did last night, for instance, I would tell them that I attended an essential oils webinar and that would be the truth.  I could also lie by saying that I had tea with Steve Martin in a rowboat filled with penguins on the moon.  Or that I sat in my car and counted to 56,987.  Or that I bought a pair of pants with alligators on them.  Endless possibilities.  It's not that I'm not creative, (which Christopher is not) it is just that I find honesty to be the best policy. 

SPOILER ALERT:  I thought it was pretty obvious from the get-go that Christopher's father killed Wellington.  His need for Christopher to drop the topic and his remorseful tears when he is found late at night crying were red flags for me.  And, yes, I have read this book before, but it was 5 1/2 years ago, in one sitting.. and I didn't remember much about it apart from the interesting narration.  Did anyone else see it coming?  I think it's pretty safe to say that we all knew it before Christopher did. 

I also found it interesting that some of the things that make me super uncomfortable are the things he really enjoyed.  When he was told that his mother was in the hospital, he wanted to visit because he liked uniforms and machines.  I hate visiting hospitals.  It's always awkward and uncomfortable and upsetting. 

But one thing that I thought was spot-on in his thinking was how we let things out of our control dictate what kind of day we will have.  As I read about his system of counting car colors as they appeared in a sequence (4 red in a row, 4 yellow in a row, etc.), I thought it was a silly way to decide if he'd be in a good mood or to not speak to anyone.  Extreme, right?  But then he explained that some people (like me) work in an office building where it does not actually matter if it is raining or sunny... but they feel happy when it is sunny and sad when it is rainy.  And you know what?  Sometimes that is what determines my mood.  How silly of me!


To an extent, I also understand that having things in order can make one feel safe or at least feel better.  I feel completely out of sorts when my house is a mess.  I may not love cleaning, but I feel better when everything is clean and tidy. 

I did not enjoy this book the second time through as much as I enjoyed it the first time.  Christopher actually got on my nerves quite a bit this time.  I know that in his condition, he was pretty much helpless unless all conditions around him were just so, but I did feel for his parents frustrations and thought about how difficult it would be to work with this type of relationship on a daily basis. 

Here are a few of my short observations:

1.  When Christopher gets to know someone, he actually just gets to know about them.  He asks things like what kind of car they drive and what is their favorite color and what they know about the Apollo space missions.  This has nothing to do with knowing someone.  I can know those things about my favorite actor, but it doesn't mean I know him.
2.  People who like dogs can't be all bad in his mind.  I like this.  It reminds me of Captain James Hook in our previous read Peter Pan, who loved flowers and music.  No one is all bad.
3.  To Christopher, there are certain reasons that things happen and anything outside of those reasons is baffling and cannot be.  This shows when he talks about not knowing why Mr. and Mrs. Shears divorced.  The reasons he lists for divorce are: "because one of you has done sex with somebody else or because you are having arguments and you hate each other and you don't want to live in the same house anymore and have children."  There are no other explanations in his mind.
4. Page 69 talks about how alien spaceships probably would not look like the flying saucers we imagine.  It's weird because I had been thinking something similar the day before I read this page.  Why do we assume aliens would have human-like forms rather than that of pigs or snails or fish or ferns or cupcakes?  Maybe squids are the real aliens.
5.  It makes sense to me that Christopher does not believe in God the most when he SPOILER ALERT learns about his mother's affair and is not upset by it.  It is in the past, so it no longer exists to his mind.  God cannot be seen, heard, tasted, smelled, or felt, so he does not believe in him.  It's sad to me, but I guess I get it.
6.  I specifically thought of you, Jenni Button, when he found a letter from his mother saying she had a new job and mentioned the shopping center in Birmingham--The Bullring!  I miss England adventures with you!

7.  SPOILER ALERT Even though I had previously read this novel, I completely forgot that Christopher's mother hadn't died and his dad lied about that.  That sucks.  I got really mad at both parents at that part.  Father should never have said that she died.  Mother should not have left her son with special needs with no explanation.  It just all around sucks.  I think this family needs serious counseling.
8.  It also sucks that, while Father did some pretty terrible things (SPOILER ALERT: saying Mother was dead, killing Wellington), he really does love his son so much and loses his trust when he comes clean.  In Christopher's mind, if Father can kill Wellington and tell lies, he may very well kill him, too.
9.  Lastly, I'm sad that Christopher's "good dream" consists of pretty much everyone in the world dying and him being free to do as he pleases and not have to see anyone.  I have days when I just want to be by myself, but I also get lonely and crave human interaction.  Kyle and I are kind of homebodies who don't really get out very much.  Some of that is because we know so few people here in SC (still), but I cherish times when we do get out and socialize once in a while.

All in all, I think I'd give this book five out of ten stars.  It's interesting, but I don't find it to be super entertaining.  It's worth the read, but not something I want to read over and over again.  How would you rate it?   What were your thoughts?


Friday, September 20, 2013

The winner of the third book vote is...

I asked for your votes and I got them!  Some were via Facebook and it has been pointed out to me that not everyone can post a comment on this blog.  I've got to fix that issue, so if anyone has any ideas on how, let me know! 

Anyway, the third book we'll be discussing will be The Day I Ate Whatever I Wanted by Elizabeth Berg.  This should be interesting!  It's a book of short stories, so I may break it down into a few posts so it is easier to follow and discuss.  I'm warning you, readers, I'm not usually a short-stories kind of girl, but perhaps your support will spur me on! 

The post for The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time should go up soon... this weekend?  Perhaps.  And so you can feel free to discuss that unique novel.

If you have not posted any discussion on Peter Pan and you wish to be heard, please feel free to post!  I really enjoy reading what you say and, if I haven't mentioned, it is one of my very, very, very favorites!  When I learned of several of you actually reading it for the first time, my heart just sang and swelled with pride.  It's a story familiar to just about everyone, but boy is the book worth the read, you know?

Thanks for reading, thanks for sharing.  You guys are freaking great.  :)

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

I read fast...

It's not so much that I read fast.  It's that I (usually) read three times a day.  So I only have 20 pages in The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time left to read, and I don't want to post about it yet, and I will finish it tonight.  By the way, be forewarned!  Peter Pan is a children's book, so I didn't have to worry about offensive language in that (aside from that weird part when Barrie mentioned a fairy orgy in passing... well, that was a bit awkward), but The Curious Incident..., and probably just about everything else we'll read, is going to have some language or graphic images or violence or.. I don't know.  I mean, I am not going to put 50 Shades of Grey or anything on the reading list because... well for a lot of reasons, but one is that I think some people would be offended by the content and another is that I hear the actual writing is terrible.  No, I haven't read it myself, so if you feel the need to shout at me to give it a chance before knocking it, that is fine and you can rant yourself into a maniacal little spiel, but I'm still not going to read it. 

That said, I have about a billion books that I haven't read that are waiting on my bookshelf.  I'm an avid re-reader because I like knowing that I will like the book I'm reading.  However, this book blog is supposed to be something new and different and so I think it's time to read something new and different.  Please let me know which of these four books interests you the most.  I am in random selection mode and I've never read any of them, so there is no order of ranking or anything.  It's entirely up to you (as long as you vote within the next two days... otherwise I am choosing because I can't wait that long). 

Saving the World by Julia Alvarez (click here for description)

The Stepford Wives by Ira Levin (click here for description)

 
Major Pettigrew's Last Stand by Helen Simonson (click here for description)

Or

The Day I Ate Whatever I Wanted by Elizabeth Berg (click here for description)


I think that's a pretty good mix and should cover a lot of bases as we have some historical type fiction, a thriller, a love story, and a book of short stories.  And these are just my observations from reviews.  No sci-fi this time, but I do have a few sci-fi books waiting to be read if anyone is interested in those! 

Remember, folks... I am not recommending books based on what I know.  I am just looking for what to read next.  I reserve the right to put it down and never pick it back up if I dislike it, but, in most cases, I'll try to pull through for you. 

Cast your votes!

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Would you like an adventure now or would you like to have your tea first?



I have been putting off the Peter Pan post for a few days for a slew of reasons, the first being that this is one of my very favorite books and I have read it several times.  I realized that not every would read this as quickly as I did... and I wouldn't want them to read it so fast the first time through anyway.  This story is magical and I think it's best to read it when you can take it all in.  I took lots of notes this time through, as you can see here:


In fact, scarcely a page went by without a new post-it note hitting the page and me scribbling on it frantically so that my thoughts didn't escape me. But now, as I start out on my first hurrah, I don't quite know where to begin.  I suppose I'll begin with why I love this book.  Here is a picture of some of my Peter Pan memorabilia.  I have more, but did not include it because it is scattered about:




And here's me and my friend Mallory the other day in our Disney tank tops:

And me in my homemade Peter Pan costume for Halloween a few years ago:




Peter Pan has long been one of my favorite stories.  When I was little, my sister, brother, and I frequently played Peter Pan.  Julianna and Jimmy would pass around the roles of Peter and Hook amongst themselves, but I was always Smee.  Smee!  And it's not like they told me to be Smee because I was the youngest or anything like that.  I chose to be Smee.  I feel like normal little girls would want to play Wendy or Tinker Bell, but I was a little weirdo.  Our knowledge of Peter Pan came from repeated viewing of the Mary Martin stage production.  If you are feeling nostalgic or if you have never seen this particular version, please view one of my favorite songs here.  My grandma also owned a bunch of Disney VHS tapes--you know the kind, in their big, puffy plastic cases.  Peter Pan was amongst them and so we were familiar with it as well.  And of course Hook was a huge hit when we were children.  Robin Williams makes a wonderful grown-up version of Peter Pan and Dustin Hoffman is arguably one of the very best Captain Jas. Hooks ever to grace the stage or screen.  And then, of course, came the absolutely unbelievable 2003 live action version with Jeremy Sumpter as Pan and Jason Isaacs as Mr. Darling and Captain Hook in the tradition of the original play.  Not only is it traditional for Mr. Darling and Captain Hook to be played by the same actor, but it also reflects the tyrannical order in both reality and in the make believe world of the children, though this comparison is never outwardly made in the written word.  It was not until after seeing this version of Peter Pan in the theater (it is possible that I went to see it four times on the big screen, but who is keeping track?) that I decided to read the novel, and I have a former acquaintance to thank for that.  As we were being seated in the theater, a boy named Caleb told me, when we both said we had already been to see it, that this movie probably best reflected the original story's thematic emotions, darkness, and narration.  So of course I had to read it after that.

Here I am babbling about movies and things when we're here to discuss the book!  Forgive me.  Let's jump right in.  My first notes are from the very first page and concern Mrs. Darling's kiss, which no one can seem to get.  I think that her kiss is representative of her youth and innocence and the joy of her heart, which is why it is the only bit of her that you can see when she dances and romps.  Peter Pan is also described as being very like Mrs. Darling's kiss and he is the purest essence of childhood's joy.  Mrs. Darling may be a grown woman who has put most childish things behind her, but the kiss remains and we shall talk more about my opinions on it later.  Please feel free to discuss Mrs. Darling's kiss or the subtheme of kisses throughout Peter Pan.


One of my favorite passages about Mrs. Darling is that when she is tidying her children's minds as they sleep and how every good mother does this.  This is how she discovers Peter Pan (though it seems hinted that she herself may have known him once, or at least known about him) and the Neverland, which is always similar but different for every child.  The magic of this book is that it makes it seem like we, too, have been there in our own make-believes.


I also find it interesting that twice in the first chapter and on the very same page in my book, Wendy knows something about Peter but doesn't know how she knows: that he is just her size and that he sometimes came to her room and played his pipes for her while she was asleep.  Wendy has a great deal of woman's intuition as well as childlike faith.

We're also early introduced to Mr. Darling, who demands to be respected and admired as if these are the highest honors to be received.  (This is the same reason that Hook hates Pan.  Pan is cocky and has no respect for the very fearsome pirate).  His pride is very hurt when he cannot seem to gain the reverent admiration of his family, though he is a weak sort of man when he pours his medicine into Nana's bowl... and nearly has a fit over his tie... and totals up how much each child will cost him, though of course he loves them dearly.

Now, on to Peter Pan himself.  I love how, in his adventure into the real world to bring the Darling children to his own world, even the stars are on his side.   Though a bit of a know-it-all in his cockiness, Peter is immature and ignorant of real world things.  He knows not how to read or write and doesn't understand motherly things like sewing and he cannot tell the difference between real and pretend.  When I read Kyle the passage about the Lost Boys having to pretend they have had their dinners, Kyle felt very sorry for them.  But to Peter, real and pretend are one in the same.  I feel that this is absolutely perfectly demonstrated in Hook during the food fight scene, when the grown-up Peter Pan finally learns the power of pretend.  The best clip I could find is of Insults at imaginary dinner, but the realization that his mind makes it real comes at the end.  Even when the island "comes true" Peter knows nothing but make believe, so it is real to him.  He actually believes Slightly wearing John's hat to be a doctor, for instance.   Wendy demonstrates her maturity over Peter from the very start and SPOILER ALERT this will lead her to return home from Neverland later on.

Peter is described frequently as being cocky.  In fact, Barrie states that, "To put it with brutal frankness, there never was a cockier boy."  Of course he is cocky, living in a make-believe world where he is the essentially the boss, where he has incredible adventures that swell his head all the more and where no one tells him what to do.  Children are pretty cocky by nature.  Don't get me wrong, I love kids.  However, young children do not always realize that the world is made up of more than their worlds, their perceptions.  The difference between ordinary children and Peter Pan is independence.  Children dependent on their parents or guardians think only of themselves at times because they are sort of helpless creatures.  Peter thinks only of himself because he has no parents or anyone else to take care of him and must do everything for himself.  And, being able to take care of himself amazingly, his childhood cockiness is extremely magnified.  In many examples throughout the book, we read Peter saying things that may be true or may be complete nonsense because he says whatever comes to mind.  This shows that he is completely uninhibited by reason and his imagination is completely free.  He, too, possesses a dark streak of pride, shown in his absolute joy in the face of danger and in places like the flight to Neverland with the Darling children, when he saves the falling sleepers at the very last second to show off his cleverness.  Indeed, his head is so full of adventures and his cocky pride that he is forgetful of all else, like when he doesn't seem to know the others when he takes off on adventures between London and the Neverland and returns to find the Darlings.  SPOILER ALERT Or when he forgets to come and get Wendy for years on end for their Spring Cleaning at the end of the book.

I'd like to point out a quote from page 44 in my copy (In chapter 4 The Flight) describing how Neverland differs when you are and aren't there:
"In the old days at home the Neverlad had always begun to look a little dark and threatening by bedtime.  Then unexplored patches arose in it and spread, black shadows moved about in them, the roar of the beasts of prey was quite different now, and above all, you lost certainty that you would win.  You were quite glad that the night-lights were in,  You even liked Nana to say this was just the mantelpiece over here, and that the Neverland was all Make believe.   
Of course the Neverland had been make-believe in those days, but it was real now, and there were no night-lights, and it was getting darker every moment, and where was Nana?"

I like this passage because this is exactly how I feel alone at night.  If Kyle happens to be on shift, I spend the night by myself and I never think that I will get agitated or frightened until it gets dark and I do.

In the chapter entitled The Island Come True (5), the island is described without Peter on it and we see that adventures are not so very adventurous without him.  I picture him to be something of a heartbeat to the island itself, and that is why the pirates and lost boys merely bite their thumbs at one another when they meet without Peter.  He is the passion and lifeblood of the Neverland.  In the 2003 movie version, the Neverland sees winter snow when Peter is away and springtime when he reappears, which helps the pirates recognize that he has returned.  I tried to find a clip of this scene but I can't.  If you haven't seen it, though, you should.  I vote this Peter Pan the one you are most likely to get a crush on.  I know he's like a 14 year old boy, but he's adorable and charming with the most cunning smile I've ever seen on a Peter Pan.  And don't think I am a total creep.  I saw the movie when I was in high school, so I was pretty young myself.  haha



When Barrie describes each of the Lost Boys in this chapter, I noticed that he narrates not only to us, the audience, but he also addresses characters in the book.  He issues a warning to poor Tootles here, which I rather enjoy.  This was when I first noticed him speaking to us and to the characters, but it is done throughout the story and sort of adds another layer.  My personal favorite Lost Boy is Slightly.  If you have footnotes and end notes like my copy does, you know that his name comes from the fact that "Slightly Soiled" was written on his pinafore the day he was lost.  He assumes this to be his name, which is pretty hilarious.  Slightly is called the most conceited of the boys, but I think he is also the most homesick for his old life.  Clinging to his silly misconstrued name as well as pretending he knows much more than he actually knows about our world tell me that he misses his old life, even if he cannot remember it entirely.  I have a soft spot for Slightly.  He's such a lovable little know-it-all.  Who was your favorite Lost Boy?

This chapter also gives us a great introduction to the beasts of the island and the Indians and pirates.  I love the bit about Smee having "pleasant names for everything" including his jagged knife, which he calls Johnny Corkscrew.  I think that Smee and I would get along famously as I like to name things, too.  I name cars and have a list in my head of great names for cats (Nibs and Slightly are on that list) and I even christened a spider who lived near our porch Josephine.  (She was not a harmful spider.  We googled her to make sure. She kept the bugs down, too).  SPOILER ALERT Captain Hook overhears the boys in their underground home by pure accident and concocts a plan to have them killed by cooking them a cake (I guess we are to assume it is poisoned as it does not actually say so, but they mean for the boys to perish upon eating it), but Wendy becomes their mother in time to prevent the boys from eating the cake and it is briefly mentioned later that the cake hardens and they use it as a missile and Captain Hook trips over it in the dark.  The point of Hook discovering their unique home with doors for each of them and deciding to kill them with cake (and what better way to go, I say!) is that he sees things the boys overlook as they don't have mothers.  However, we soon find out Peter was using his genius creativity to create a door for each boy and it is a great protection to their home underground.  Annnd here's a clip from the Mary Martin stage version to verify that just about everyone in Neverland, not just the Lost Boys, wants a mother!  Captain Hook's Tarantella

Can I ask why the part with Nibs running from the wolf pack is not in any visual version that I can remember?  At least I don't recall ever seeing the Lost Boys look through their legs (because they think that's what Peter would do) at the wolves to scare them off... Do you know of any?  Because I literally laughed aloud at this part this time through.   

Another weird thing that is never referenced is that, at the end of Chapter 6 The Little House, Peter is standing guard over Wendy's lovely house they have just built around her to give her a rest and he falls asleep and some "unsteady fairies had to climb over him on their way home from an orgy."  Really Barrie?  An orgy?  I plan to read this book to my kids someday (it really is a children's book, after all), but I plan to just replace this word with the word party.  However, fairies do seem to be awfully peculiar creatures, mostly without morals.

In Chapter 7 The Home Underground, Wendy gives the boys examinations to see if they can remember their previous homes.  These are mostly for the benefit of herself, John, and Michael, but of course the others join in because what is frightfully commonplace to regular children is interesting and exciting to the lost boys and vice versa.  This is also seen in places such as Wendy's fascination with fairies when Peter first comes to her home in London, but here we see Peter taking on the role of father as a new adventure, even though it makes it so his adventures consist of sitting on a stool doing nothing sometimes.  This demonstrates to me that the Neverland is imagination and it makes reason forgetful, thus Wendy uses the examination papers to try to jog the memory of reason in her brothers' past lives.  Peter has no reason because he chose to live in the imagination world at such a young age that he rejects it and it rejects him.

Chapter 8 The Mermaid's Lagoon shows a sort of half strength and half weakness that I find particularly interesting in Peter.  This is that every unfairness he encounters is like his very first because he soon forgets them altogether.  This is a strength in that he does not live with the burden of life's many unfairnesses, but a weakness in that each one he meets dazes him.  This unawareness, I think, lends to him being such a gentlemanly fellow that he can SPOILER ALERT send Wendy to safety when the lagoon becomes a dangerous place and he has no means to escape.  He also has his extreme cockiness, but in addition, he holds youth's eternal hope when he thinks that "To die will be an awfully big adventure."

I do enjoy the way Wendy and Peter pretend to be scandalized, uppity, condescending parents to the boys and find themselves convinced to dance only because "it's a Saturday night," which it may or may not have been.  They are playing that which they do not entirely wish to become.  This is when Wendy asks Peter Pan his true feelings for her.  As young as they are, Wendy probably does not quite realize what she is asking of him.  It is all part of their make-believe playing house, but she is a reasonable and womanly creature who does have strong feelings, even if they are premature.  Peter cannot answer in a way that would satisfy her.

Children are selfish, heartless creatures, to which a mother's love is necessary.  Page 100 Wendy's Story  SPOILER ALERT They are also spontaneous and unsentimental, as demonstrated when the Lost Boys want to go with Wendy.  Page 103

Peter believes that his mother shut the window and forgot about him, which turns him against all mothers but Wendy, who he somehow knows (maybe doesn't know how he knows) that she will always love him.  (I love when Barrie described mothers as "the toads" when he hears Peter's side).  Even if it isn't true, he believes it to be true and that makes it true to him.   Page 101

Peter is very like a fairy... sometimes all good and sometimes all naughty, vindictive, angry, or jealous, as when he decides to kill many grown-ups by breathing as quickly as possible (every time you breathe in Neverland, a grown-up dies so the saying went). Page 101

SPOILER ALERT  I think that Peter would have been grateful for an outlet for his feelings in a battle with the pirates, but they kind of outsmarted him (even though some didn't really catch on right away) in Chapter 12 The Children Are Carried Off when they beat the tom-tom to indicate an Indian victory, making Wendy and the children feel safe to leave.

In Chapter 13 Do You Believe in Fairies?  I noticed that Wendy is described as only a little girl.  This is during a time when she is in fear and fascination of Captain Hook.  In times of adventure and home life with the Lost Boys, she is considered a mother and authority, but she quickly shies back to a child in times of distress.  Perhaps since she made the decision to go home, she has realized her place and position are not right for her here.  Later on in the story, the boys are described that same way, as only boys. 

There are also fascinating passages about Peter in this chapter, such as those that show a somewhat passive aggressive nature in him when he laughs instead of cries when he realizes how Wendy would hate it and how he won't take his medicine for the same reason.  I'm sure he'd never have done those things in front of her.  And what are Peter's painful dreams about?  Does he miss his own mother?  Is it because he is aware that Wendy must grow up?  Is it some fear that he does not know when he is awake?  Whatever it may be, when he is awakened by Tink, he knows that he must rescue Wendy from the pirates without hesitation, just as he rescued her from womanhood when he took her from her home.

Tinker Bell's very famous scene in which she SPOILER ALERT drinks the poison Hook poured into Peter's medicine and must be revived by children who believe in fairies touches my heart because Peter calls upon children in our world to save her, not upon those he knows in the Neverland.  Thus, in dreaming, Neverland becomes a reality.  

Chapter 14 The Pirate Ship explores Captain Hook's origins as a former Eton College student (this is in the footnotes, in case your book does not have them) and his obsession with good form.  As we saw in the previous chapter, the villain  is humanized in his fear of going down Slightly's door.  He hates Pan but is also petrified of him.  I also liked the bit about him not being all bad in that he loved flowers and music.  His value of good form and distaste for bad form point toward his pride.  Good form = a reason to be prideful without being so, but later he shows bad form in taking out anger on the boys because "they had seen him unbend" (Chapter 15).  How realistic it seems to me to hate someone all the more when they see your shortcomings!  SPOILER ALERT We witness his heartbreak when he is shamed in Chapter 15 "Hook or Me This Time" when Pan reveals himself.  And we see the contrast between the children and the pirates in representing joy/goodness and bitterness/evil/despair/depression/sorrow respectively.  SPOILER ALERT I find it somehow comforting that Hook dies content, finding Peter to have had bad form in his last moment.  I suppose this is because he has been humanized.  But again we see Peter having a painful dream, and here I think it is because of the lost innocence of himself, the boys, and the Darling children.

Why is Wendy so obsessed with giving them all medicine anyway?  Is it because her adventure to the Neverland with Peter would never have happened if not for the episode with her father and Nana and the bowl of medicine?

SPOILER ALERT  Why do you think Peter takes on some of Captain Hook's traits once the villain is vanquished?

I find Barrie's narration on Mrs. Darling to be reflective of Peter's in Chapter 16 The Return Home.  He scoffs at her absolute love for her children and her want of them to have as much joy as possible, though it lends to her misery while she waits for their return, not knowing if they will.

SPOILER ALERT  It is nice to see Mr. Darling's representation of good form when he humbles himself to Nana's dog house as his punishment for the flight of his children. 

SPOILER ALERT  Peter's last (secret) attempt to keep Wendy is to close the nursery window so that she will believe her parents have forgotten her when she returns home and feel that the best place for her would be the Neverland with him.  Wendy is suspended between childhood and womanhood, selfishness and responsibility.  Peter hates to let her go, but eventually he does with a "frightful sneer at the laws of nature," wherein he knows that she is not like him and she must grow up because she has chosen to do so.  So when Wendy is returned and he sees the happy reunion, this is they joy from which he must be barred.  Wendy is this joy.  Mother is this joy.  Familial love is this joy.

When Wendy Grew Up, Chapter 17, is a sad one to me because the Neverland make-believes come to an end for so many.  SPOILER ALERT Though the Darlings are poor, they do decide to take in the lost boys as their own, once Mr. Darling finds they all will respect him and love him as well as Mrs. Darling.  I find his softened pride and tears of vulnerability touching here because it is not so much respect and admiration he wants now as love, even if he does not quite realize it.  When Wendy asks Peter if he's like to speak with her parents about a "very sweet subject," she is imploring him to talk to them of marrying her someday, but this would go against the "riddle of his being" and though he loves Wendy, he will not and almost cannot grow up.  Wendy is allowed to go back to Neverland for a week each year (I wish I could go!) to help Peter with spring cleaning, a very motherly thing to do, and we see that when Peter leaves, he takes Mrs. Darling's kiss with him--the kiss that no one could ever get.  I see this as that innocent joy of her heart, which is Wendy.  She has sort of released Wendy's heart to Peter rather than clinging to it herself.

I do love that the Lost Boys realize that it was a mistake to decide to grow up.
Did you see in the end notes that Slightly could not really have become a Lord by marrying a Lady of title?  He would be the one to try, wouldn't he?

SPOILER ALERT  When Peter returns for Wendy and cannot remember Tinker Bell or Captain Hook, Wendy is distraught, but I do think it makes sense.  They no longer exist because the children who believed in them and knew them are no longer part of the Neverland and most of them no longer even believe in it.  I do get pretty weepy at the part when Peter forgets Wendy while she waits for him to come for her and Michael whispers that perhaps there is no such person.  Leaving childhood innocence behind is heartbreaking for some.  Some accept it readily.  I was not amongst them, so this scene touches my heart especially.  Wendy's baby daughter was surely written in a golden splash in her heart  and became her "kiss" though Jane turns out to be as "gay and innocent and heartless" as she and her brothers once were.  Wendy's fondness for Peter is so bittersweet in the line "She let her hands play in the hair o the tragic boy.  She was not a little girl heart-broken about him; she was a grown woman smiling at it all, but they were wet smiles."  And she lets her daughter go to be his new mother... and on and on and on in the fashion of literary comedy.  Wendy is essentially reborn as Peter's mother when he finds her daughter Jane, and in turn, her daughter Margaret, and her daughter, and hers, and hers "so long as children are gay and innocent and heartless."


 So that was the longest post ever and I forgive you if you didn't read it.  I hope to hear some observations, questions, or feedback from any or all of you!  I really hope that you enjoyed this book.  I know that I did!

Our next book will be The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

What will we read next?

Hello friends,

I finished Peter Pan last night and will prepare a post about that fine work of literature within the next few days.  I am not going to set a deadline in which you need to read the book and I will post Spoiler Alerts in case you decide to read the posts without having finished the book.  Since this is my first book blog, I am totally open to suggestions on how to make this a more discussion-friendly format.  If deadlines need to be set into place, we can do so, but I know everyone has different schedules, time constraints, and reading paces and I'd like this to be a leisurely pursuit of community. 

That said, I cannot go long without a new book in hand.  I typically read during breakfast, at my lunch break, and at bedtime, some days more, but rarely less.  Since finishing Peter Pan last night, I searched for a new Book Blog book for this morning, but I was running behind and unable to read.  As the blog club is brand new and I am still working on how it will be done, I thought it would be wise to read another book I've read before as sort of a comfort zone thing to get me started.  Listed are a few that I thought would be good starters.  If any jump out at you, please say so and we'll start them together!

  • The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd (fiction)

  • The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls (nonfiction memoir)

  • Snow Flower and the Secret Fan by Lisa See (historical fiction)

  • The Nobodies Album by Carolyn Parkhurst (sort of a murder mystery fiction)

  • The Rapture of Canaan by Sheri Reynolds (fiction)

  • Local Girls by Alice Hoffman (fiction)

  • Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Café by Fannie Flagg (fiction)

  • The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon (fiction)

I like them all enough to read again and discuss.  Some of them I've read more than once, some I have not read in years and would like to revisit.  Please read a description of each if you like.  I feel that almost any description of The Rapture of Canaan will have at least one spoiler in it (INCLUDING THE BACK OF THE BOOK) but I give you my guarantee that it's a good read.  It is actually in my purse right now because I was leaning toward it or Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Café.  My only hesitation with the latter is that I do not wish for this blog to turn into a debate rather than a discussion. 

What do you think?  Care to cast a vote?

Friday, September 6, 2013

Welcome!

Dear friends,

I have long wanted to join or begin a book club.  My enjoyment of reading may be surpassed only by my enjoyment of tea.  Or kittens.  Or snuggling.  Or oven warmed baked goods.  Or a good belly laugh.  Oh, I don't know.  There are so many happy pleasures of life, but surely reading is one of the best of all.

I'm glad you've decided to read with me.  The first book on my Book Club list is one of my very favorites:  Peter Pan by J.M. Barrie.  Of course I knew that I would want to include this masterpiece classic at some point, but when it was recommended to me as the starting book, it made perfect sense to me.  I am rereading it (for perhaps the tenth time) at the moment so that I may be fresh to discuss it with you.  If you are embarking on this adventure with me, please keep in mind that the novel Peter Pan is over 100 years old and British and so there may be some phrasing or situations that are foreign to you.  I find it helpful to read the footnotes and endnotes included in my copy, which is a Barnes and Noble Classic with an introduction and notes by Amy Billone and illustrations by F.D. Bedford.  I also like to research little things, such as Michael's "getting into shirts" mentioned in chapter I: Peter Breaks Through."  Michael is the youngest of the Darling children and only just growing old enough for schooling, thus he will no longer be dressing in the traditional pinafores of his young boyhood, but on his birthday, he'll begin wearing shirts and trousers. 

I believe that any version of J.M. Barrie's Peter Pan will do for the purposes of our reading pleasure and discussion.  However, be aware while making your selection that it is, indeed, Peter Pan, and not an earlier edition by Barrie such as Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens or Peter and Wendy (or The Little White Bird, though that is a bit of a stretch), while also being mindful that there are more recent Peter Pan tales by Dave Barry and Ridley Pearson, such as Peter and the Starcatchers or Peter and the Shadow Thieves

I would also advise that you keep in mind that the novel is always different from the movie adaptation, no matter which of the adaptations you may be thinking about!  Pan has been picked over and put back together for the silver screen so many times that it is hard not to imagine the elf-eared, redheaded cartoon from the beloved Disney classic (or, in my case, Mary Martin from the stage production), or Dustin Hoffman as Captain James Hook after watching Hook several hundred times.  I implore you, try to separate yourself from preconceived notions of Peter, Wendy, Tinker Bell, Tiger Lily, Smee, Captain Hook, or any of the Lost Boys.  Barrie's novel is pure imagination at its finest and I hope that you will enjoy this read as much as I always do. 

I will be posting my opinions, snippets, and thoughts on the book when I finish it.  Please feel free to post yours as you read or when you finish, too!  I am looking forward to starting this club together!